<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Integration on RLGeeX</title><link>https://www.rlgeex.com/tags/integration/</link><description>Recent content in Integration on RLGeeX</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>RLGeeX © 2025 - Real-Life Geeks providing expert IT consulting</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 09:00:00 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.rlgeex.com/tags/integration/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>What MCP Actually Solves: From N Connectors to One Integration Layer</title><link>https://www.rlgeex.com/news/what-mcp-actually-solves-from-n-connectors-to-one-integration-layer/</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 09:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://www.rlgeex.com/news/what-mcp-actually-solves-from-n-connectors-to-one-integration-layer/</guid><description>&lt;p>If you lead a platform or infrastructure team that is wiring agents into real systems, this post sets out what the Model Context Protocol buys you and what it doesn&amp;rsquo;t. MCP replaces the per-pair connector with one integration layer: one server per system and one reusable client-side protocol implementation per agent application. That is the whole point. It does not remove the system-specific work, and it does not reduce the number of live connections you operate. Knowing where that boundary sits tells you where to spend your team&amp;rsquo;s effort.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>